Decision Making Processes - the Missiles of October

Home - Decision Making Techniques - - Decision Making Processes - the Missiles of October

02.09.2019-6 views -Decision Making Techniques -

 Decision Making Procedures - the Missiles of October Dissertation

The dynamic means of decision making covered in the movie, The Missiles of August (1974, ) was practically nail-biting. As I watched the movie, it was difficult for me to distinct myself through the fact that I used to be a baby in 1962. Consequently, I was totally dependent on mother and father for security, but how aware were my parents that their security rested in the hands with the President of the United States? His ability to make up your mind concerning the way forward for millions of lives was put on the line. He'd be responsible for the end result of the decision, good or bad.

Harrison (1999), explains the active process of making decisions as a sophisticated process, filled with information, detours, uncertainty, fuzziness, and turmoil. Though most decisions manufactured in corporate America do not practically reach the top of the decisions made by universe leaders during the missile crisis, it has to be reviewed like a process we need to understand whenever we are to produce appropriate decisions as commanders in our individual right.

In order to follow a making decisions process, one must be aware of setting goals. Objectives let us to measure each of our success in accomplishing the organizational goal (Harrison, 1999). President Kennedy had a number of objectives if he was first built aware of the potential for a countrywide crisis. Having been presented with photo taking evidence which the Soviet Union had missiles in Emborrachar, which were a direct threat to the United States. In previous group meetings, he was certain by the Soviet Union that this was not the truth, however , American intelligence demonstrated otherwise. His immediate response was to get his own personal benefit. It had been an selection year and he wished to win the election. By causing the wrong decision, he could lose the faith in the American public. His objective changed when he learned more details from his committee, the general public, and his personal contacts with the Soviet Union. Win or lose the election, his major concern became keeping away from a war. The potential effects of his decisions included finding American in the midst of a war, and potentially with a new president and government. Granted, his desire was to get a peaceful image resolution and to govern for several more years, however you observe how 1 decision has the ability to stream into so many various other potential areas (Bazerman, 2005).

After a target is determined, in such a case, to avoid a war, the decision making processes demands that we search for alternatives. How can we avoid a war? During the many meetings conducted both with the leader or devoid of, it became apparent that a few of the alternatives had been going to be difficult to decide upon. The movie mentions blockades, quarantines, invasion, risks, and war. In addition , alternatives also require informing the general public and the associated with the processes staying considered, also to what degree should they learn. Every decision made, causes yet another decision, another problem or answer. The process becomes ineffective once responsible parties don't use well-known information, or perhaps ignore this and generate haphazard decisions (Harrison, 1999).

Once alternatives are discovered, the next process must are the evaluation and comparison of these alternatives. To achieve this, one must use the procedures of judgment, bargaining, and analysis (Harrison, 1999). This method was not taken lightly through the movie. Every participant brought their own daily activities to the table. Several worked so that you can please the president, a lot of to guarantee their own inside voices would be at rest (Bazerman, 2005). All of them had distinct strengths and weaknesses and so they all acquired different backgrounds and experience. This kind of group necessary to use all their skills for the best of all their ability to be able to evaluate all of the potential alternatives to warfare. Oddly, several were apt to declare war even before all of the information was on the table. Had this been an individual's responsibility instead of a group decision, the incorrect person...

References: Bazerman, M. (2006). Wisdom in managerial decision-making. (6th ed. ) New York: Steve Wiley & Sons.

Harrison, E. F. (1999) The managerial decision-making process. (5th ed. ) Boston: Houghton Mifflin

Page, A. (Director) (1974). The missiles of October [Motion Picture]. (Available via MPI Press Group, 16101 South 108th Avenue, Orland Park, ELLE 60466).